Admissibility of Scientific Evidences in Indian Courts
This project examines the discerning process by which the tribunal of facts arrives at conclusions concerning the material elements of the case, specifically with regards to its inclusion or exclusion. Rule 702 and the Daubert precedence provide some general criteria on accepting scientific evidences/expert opinions but a similarly explicit regulation or case law is starkly missing from the Indian jurisprudence and associated legislation such as the Indian Evidence Act or Criminal Procedure Code. With rapidly advancing scientific inquiry rendering some of the previously acceptable science obsolete, and producing new sciences for the courts to entertain, the need of the hour is of increased scientific literacy among the legal community. The ultimate decision to include or exclude any specific scientific evidence or technique should be the product of scientific and informed deliberations on part of the judiciary.